Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (eb69a86) 68.87% compared to head (1efd55a) 68.80%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #58      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.87%   68.80%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          23       23              
  Lines        1825     1827       +2     
==========================================
  Hits         1257     1257              
- Misses        365      367       +2     
  Partials      203      203              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gfanton , these changes seem harmless, but are they being used anywhere?

@jefft0 to do a local replace and see if we can still compile dependant repos like weshnet and berty. Check if the changes in this PR force those repos to implement json marshalling.

I did a force push of of rebasing this PR to the latest master.

This repo is a dependency for go-orbit-db. I update its go.mod with a replace to use this PR. make test on go-orbit-db has a stack overflow error. See the attached log.
error.txt

@gfanton said "Looks like a recursive json unmarshal. Will be hard to find".

I confirm that we can build go-orbit-db, weshnet and berty with a local go.mod replace for this PR. But still have the "stack overflow" error shown above.

@gfanton will ask if it's OK to merge this.

Closing. @gfanton says "doesn't think it will be useful anyways and can probably introduce some problems."